Real sites.
What actually changed.
Most security companies ask you to take their word for it. We'd rather show you the work — the site, the problem, and what changed after we showed up. Serving British Columbia since 2015.
Security is easy to promise and hard to prove.
We don't publish client names by default, and we'd rather explain why than pretend it's modesty. Security work that becomes someone else's marketing material is a liability for the client — a public record of where a building was weak. So our case studies are anonymised as policy, and named only when a client asks to be. What anonymity doesn't stop us publishing is the part that actually matters: the site type, the problem, what we put on it, and what changed. Those are below. If you want references before you sign, ask — we'll arrange a call with a client in your sector.
A supportive-housing operator
A round-the-clock site where de-escalation matters more than anything else. We put trained guards on a fixed roster who observe, report, and coordinate with the operator's own staff — the kind of steady presence these buildings actually need.
Request the full study →A multi-site strata council
Several buildings, one council, and three vendors before us. We consolidated patrols, cameras and all reporting under one team, cut the council from three monthly invoices to one, and gave them a single record of what happened, where — across every building.
Request the full study →A construction developer
An active build with tools and material exposed overnight. We combined mobile patrol on an irregular schedule with our own camera coverage and live monitoring, so after-hours activity gets watched live and logged — not discovered the next morning.
Request the full study →Anonymized examples · named case studies added as clients consent
Got a site with a problem like these?
Free, no-obligation assessment across British Columbia — from a local team that does the work and shows it.